Filtered By: Topstories
News

SC ruling on party-list reps might derail Cha-cha moves


Palparan welcomes SC rule, to continue fight vs rebels Jovito Palparan Jr., the man branded as "butcher" by activists, is very happy with the latest ruling of the Supreme Court, which entitles him and 31 more party-list representatives to sit in Congress for the full implementation of the constitutional provision on the party-list system. The retired major general clarified that he is not sure about the ruling because he’s yet to see the Court decision. Nonetheless, he welcomes the ruling and looks forward to working for his constituents as Rep. Palparan. “It [the ruling] is a reward for the effort of my constituents to represent them. I am happy to do something for them. We already lost two years so maybe we would just catch up," Palparan said in a phone interview with GMANews.TV Tuesday night. Palparan is the representative of Bantay, a party-list group focusing on anti-communism work. It also supports the military by following-up on their clearing operations. Once seated at the House of Representatives, Palparan said he would help communities affected by the communist New People’s Army (NPA). “Bantay would help societies afflicted with security problems. We will help our constituents which include those marginalized, the Cafgu’s because of their low salary, the BDS [Barangay Defense System], and the people affected by the NPA," he said. Palparan, a staunch ally of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, revealed that he already has a stand on the controversial move for Charter change, which is now being taken up at the House. He, however, refused to divulge more information about his position on Charter change, saying “he still has to study his moves properly." In an en-banc landmark ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional the two-percent threshold in the distribution of additional party-list seats. The ruling means that all available seats for sectoral groups in the House will be filled to satisfy a constitutional provision which states that party-list representatives “shall constitute 20 per centum of the total number of representatives." The ruling also disallowed major political parties from participating in party-list elections. Palparan’s party ranked 32nd in the Supreme Court's list of party-list groups entitled to have seats in the House of Representatives.- Aie Balagtas See, GMANews.TV
MANILA, Philippines - The victory of more party-list groups in the House of Representatives could also signal the failure of administration lawmakers to fast-track moves for Charter change. In an en-banc landmark ruling on Tuesday, April 21, the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional the two-percent threshold in the distribution of additional party-list seats. The high court’s decision means that all available seats for sectoral groups in the House will be filled up to satisfy a constitutional provision which states that party-list representatives “shall constitute 20 per centum of the total number of representatives." At least 32 more House seats will be filled up by party-list groups following the high tribunal’s “immediately executory" 35-page decision penned by Associate Justice Antonio Carpio. The ruling also disallowed major political parties from participating in party-list elections. Because of the ruling, party list groups Bayan Muna and Buhay will get the maximum three seats each and two seats each for the Citizens Battle Against Corruption (Cibac), Gabriela, Association of Philippine Electric Cooperatives (APEC), A-Teacher, Akbayan, Alagad, Coop-Natco, Butil, Batas, ARC, Anakpawis, Abono, Amin, Agap, and An Waray. More signatures The decision might not sit well with those in favor of amending the Constitution, according to Neri Javier Colmenares, Bayan Muna’s legal counsel and head of the National Union of People’s Lawyers. Colmenares said that because of the ruling, pro-Charter change House members “may have to secure more signatures to back moves" for the overhaul of the Constitution. Efforts to amend the Constitution are poised to go full steam at the House with 175 lawmakers backing a resolution seeking to convene Congress into a constituent assembly. The signatures of at least 197 congressmen are needed to represent three-fourths of the combined number (261) of the House (238) and Senate (23). With the new SC ruling, pro-Charter change lawmakers would have to secure 24 more signatures from the 32 new party-list lawmakers. A total of 221 votes – which is three-fourths of the new combined number (294) of the House (270) and Senate (23) – are then needed to convene Congress into a constituent assembly if the House and Senate were to vote jointly. But Speaker Prospero Nograles who is advancing moves for Charter change thinks that the high court’s ruling could be unconstitutional because the Charter limits the number of House members to only 250 “unless otherwise fixed by law." House takes up Cha-cha proposal A resolution seeking to amend the 1987 Constitution's economic provisions was finally set in motion in Tuesday's plenary session. La Union Rep. Victor Ortega, chair of the committee on constitutional amendments delivered his sponsorship speech of Speaker Prospero Nograles' House Resolution 737, which was questioned by several lawmakers, mostly from the minority block. In his speech, Ortega said it was the right time to take up the challenge of economic reforms that would make the country more economically competent. "Let us set aside partisan politics. Consider more the merits of the proposed amendments," Ortega said, adding that he is hoping for "more comprehensive" and "diversified" discussions in plenary. HR 737 is co-authored by 161 House members, Ortega said. Nograles has earlier said HR 737 would undergo the legislative route of the enactment of bills, meaning the House and the Senate would have to approve separate versions of the resolution before these are consolidated into one measure. No hope in the Senate At the upper chamber, Senate president Juan Ponce Enrile said that Nograles' "fourth mode" of rewriting the Constitution would not prosper in the upper chamber. Enrile doubted if Nograles' Resolution 737 could muster three-fourths vote in the Senate, adding that there was not sufficient time to push for Charter change. “Mahirap ma-achieve ang three fourths dito. Ilan kami sa majority [It's hard to gather a three-fourths vote here. How many are we in the majority bloc] and even the majority we cannot, there is no unanimity, the minority will, I’m sure, will not vote in favor," Enrile said adding the he was personally not in favor of the Speaker's resolution. - SOPHIA DEDACE, GMANews.TV