Filtered By: Topstories
News

Palace: Not enough evidence to hold Puno liable for Aug 23 tragedy


Malacañang said Interior Undersecretary Rico Puno was not held liable for the alleged mishandling of the August 23 hostage tragedy because the incident was treated as a local crisis. In an interview on ANC channel's "Headstart" on Tuesday, Presidential Legal Counsel Ed de Mesa said "there was nothing we could attribute to Puno. He wasn't with [the] Crisis Committee, all he did was relay to [the] President." De Mesa said President Benigno Simeon Aquino III instructed them "to look carefully for anything that could justify charging Puno with anything. But we weren't able to find any." On former Philippine National Police chief, Director General Jesus Verzosa, De Mesa said he was also not held liable because he was not the immediate superior of the policemen who handled the crisis. On Monday, Aquino disclosed that the Palace legal advisers recommended that charges be filed against several police officials including Manila Police District (MPD) Chief Superintendent Rodolfo Magtibay, the on-scene commander during the crisis, for "gross incompetence and serious neglect of duty." On the other hand, that the administration chose not to follow the recommendation of the Incident Investigation and Review Committee (IIRC) to sanction Puno, Verzosa, and Manila City Vice-Mayor Isko Moreno. In the ANC interview, De Mesa said the Palace legal advisers did not agree with all the recommendations contained in the original report submitted to Aquino in September by the IIRC, the multi-agency body tasked to investigate the August 23 hostage incident. He said the "original IIRC report recommended criminal liabilities for Verzosa, Puno" but "we did not agree." No need to drop everything for crisis De Mesa explained that even though Verzosa was the head of the police, "he didn't have to drop everything for hostage crisis." "Even PNoy did not agree that everybody should've dropped everything to solve the hostage crisis," he added. De Mesa said, "a person cannot be held liable for negligence unless there is a rule requiring him to do something, and he did not do it." "There is no crime unless there is a law that defines it and provides penalty. Not all mistakes are criminal," he added. In conducting the Palace review of the IIRC report, De Mesa said: "We had to lay the legal premises of review.There are some misconceptions.We made a list of legal premises to which we base review." Separate deaths of the hostages from bungled assault In analyzing the events surrounding the August 23 hostage incident, De Mesa said "we should separate the deaths of the hostages from the bungled assault." "We should put this incident in the proper perspective. The assault had nothing to do with the death of the hostages," he said. On August 23, a dismissed senior police senior inspector, Rolando Mendoza, hijacked a bus carrying 21 Hong Kong tourists and four Filipinos. At the end of the 11-hour standoff, Mendoza and eight Hong Kong tourists were killed. "Most of the hostages were shot prior to the assault. The most harm was delayed assistance that could have been rendered to hostages," De Mesa said. No clear guidelines De Mesa lamented that there were no clear guidelines on when an incident should be treated as a national crisis. "There were no clear guidelines when a local crisis should be declared a national crisis. This incident was handled by the local arm," he said. He explained that Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim was among those held liable for the mishandling of the crisis because he "failed to fully activate the Crisis Management Committee. At the critical moment,he left the command post without further instructions." "Based on the Crisis Management Manual, he (Lim) was supposed to be at mgt. center all the time," De Mesa explained. Officials held liable According to Aquino on Monday, at least six people will be charged with administrative cases while the hostage-taker's brother, SPO2 Gregorio Mendoza, will be charged with serious illegal detention and illegal possession of firearms. The IIRC had left Gregorio off the list of people recommended for sanctions. Aquino also instructed the Department of Justice to speed up the resolution of the serious disobedience and conspiracy in the illegal detention cases against Gregorio. Aquino ordered the National Police Commission (Napolcom) to file the appropriate charges against the following:

  • Magtibay for "gross incompetence and serious neglect of duty" and failing "to take direct and full control of the situation, and he violated protocol per the Crisis Management Manual (CMC);"
  • National Capital Region Police Office (NCRPO) chief Director Leocadio Santiago Jr. for "less grave neglect of duty" because he was the immediate superior of Magtibay but it appears that he did not closely monitor how Magtibay was handling the situation
  • Negotiator Superintendent Orlando Yebra for "neglect of duty" for "failing to appropriately alert his superiors to be ready to take the necessary action when it appeared that Mendoza had already become more agitated and violent after reading the letter from the Ombudsman considering that Mendoza was shouting and even fired a warning shot"
  • Manila Police Special Weapons and Tactics Unit head Chief Inspector Santiago Pascual III for "gross incompetence" because of his "failure to formulate an adequate plan to breach the bus" Only administrative charges were recommended by the Palace against certain persons. No criminal charges were sought against anyone, except Gregorio, the hostage-taker's brother. According to the statement, Aquino gave instructions "to expedite the resolution of the serious disobedience and conspiracy in illegal detention cases currently lodged against SPO2 Gregorio Mendoza and to instruct the Manila Police District to file appropriate complaints for illegal possession of firearms and serious illegal detention as an accomplice of his brother Rolando Mendoza." Excerpts from Aquino's statement The following are excerpts from the statement delivered by Aquino on October 11: "We understand that the major networks have taken action to discipline errant reporters and are reviewing and revising guidelines for coverage in emergency situations. These are encouraging signs that media is taking responsibility for its actions. We expect this kind of unprofessional behavior not to be repeated again, or we could be compelled to ask Congress for appropriate regulations to protect the safety of the public, our security forces and media itself. I have also admonished [Interior] Secretary [Jesse] Robredo and Undersecretary Puno for failing to uphold the high standards of performance that I demand from them. I sat them down last night. The outcome was a commitment for more professionalism, starting with their acting as one. I pledged from the very start that there would be accountability. The purpose of the Review was to find the viable legal actions which can be taken against the concerned parties. In addition, as you know, we are taking steps to enhance our ability to respond to future crises. We are redrafting the ten-year old Malacañang crisis manual written in the year 2000 to make it more responsive to not only hostage situations but other crises we may face in the future. We have also established a presidential situation room so that actions by the government in crisis situations can be more coordinated and swift. We’re also in the process of reviewing the capabilities of our security forces to see what may be done with regard to training and procurement of equipment." — RSJ, GMANews.TV