On Facebook, endless comment threads on RH
For the most divisive issues in modern history, public debate was mostly limited to traditional venues such as halls of Congress, letters to the editor and talk shows, where participants were few and everyone else was a bystander. That was then, this is now: Everyone's a potential pundit via social media, and public discussions can involve thousands. In the current Philippine political arena, perhaps no other issue has become as polarizing as the Reproductive Health (RH) bill, the social divides mirrored many times over on Facebook and Twitter. One of these Facebook threads has grown an unusually long life of its own. In early May, the GMA News Facebook account started to run a promotional plug for GMA News TV's "The Grand Debate," which aired on May 22. "It's time to weigh in on one of the hottest issues being discussed in the country today. Are you for or against the Reproductive Health Bill?" the Facebook post asked. Rabid Facebook users, however, didn't want to wait for the airing of the debate to give people a piece of their minds. Within a few days after the Facebook post, the thread managed to rack up more than 5,000 responses from pro- and anti-RH Bill netizens. What's more interesting, however, is what happened after the airing of the debate. A full four months later, the long discussion thread is still very much alive, at the same time as plenary debates in Congress continue to rage on. As of posting time, the thread already has 7,376 comments with more than 400 likes from the GMA News fans on Facebook, with the latest comment added on Sunday. It is the longest comment thread on the GMA News account, which is the most popular news media Facebook account in the Philippines with over 287,000 Likes. Debating where life begins Much like the debates in Congress, online commenters sought to answer fundamental questions related to the controversial measure. For example, one of the most contentious issues raised by debaters is about the beginning of life, which would determine whether the RH bill is a measure that promotes either maternal health or abortion. For user Michelle Lorraine Tan, who disapproves of the bill, it begins upon fertilization. "These contraceptives prevent egg and sperm from meeting, thus it prevent (sic) life. Hindi lang naman mga kaparian ang nagooppose ng bill, may mga doctor rin atbp.," she stressed. But user Aurello Agustin Ninobla thinks otherwise. "Hindi naman abortifacient (sic) ang contraceptives. They either prevent implantation or ovulation. So there is no fertilization yet." Maggie Gallardo-Ninobla, meanwhile, argued that where life begins is irrelevant when it comes to the RH bill. "If we debate on the scientific basis of when does life begin... we will never see the day when the Grand Debate will end," she pointed out. "The RH Bill is a rights-based provision. At the end of the day however, I will believe in the Supreme Being for my faith and the World Health Organization for my health," she added.